Wednesday, July 20, 2011

ACLU considers lawsuit to stop police from withholding the names of officers in shootings

In most California cities, when a police officer kills somebody, the police department withholds the officer’s name from the public. If an ordinary citizen kills somebody, the suspect’s name is released. The double standard may not be legal, however.

The Chronicle reported this morning that the ACLU of Northern California is considering a lawsuit over the practice. The ACLU filed a public records request with BART seeking the name of the officer who shot a man at the San Francisco Civic Center Plaza on July 3. BART denied the request, citing what’s known as the Copley case, which strengthened a state law sealing off misconduct inquiries from public view.

However, the Chron’s Demain Bulwa reports that the law on releasing cops’ names is far from settled. In fact, the argument for disclosure was strengthened by an opinion by Jerry Brown, when he was attorney general.

2 comments:

John F. Palmer, Jr. said...

Any person who receives a public paycheck should be identified no matter what position one holds or what circumstance occurs.

terrell said...

there's a section of state law (Gov't Code 3300-3312) called the Police Officer Bill of Rights (passed by Democrats, you liberals are so anti-freedom of information) that gives cops extraordinary rights that the rest of us don't have ... for instance, they're to be shielded from perp walks, their names are to be kept secret, they're only questioned during business hours, that complaints are to be kept secret, that their personal financial transactions (home purchases) are to be deleted from official records, etc. ... this and the copley case (look it up, you idiots) keeps everything secret when cops shoot people.