Stories on the incident include:
- • Heather Havenstein of ComputerWorld.com raises the question of whether CNN has sufficiently distinguished the difference between its reporting and that of its citizen journalists.
• James Callan of Bloomberg (and others) are reporting that the SEC is investigating the incident and that CNN is cooperating, but the network hasn't said whether it has revealed the hoaxster's IP address to the government. Callan also points out that Henry Blodget, the former Merrill Lynch & Co. Internet analyst who is now a blogger, drew attention to the iReport story by posting an item on his Silicon Alley Insider Web site.
• Blodget later posted this item, after the hoax was revealed, saying "'Citizen journalism' apparently just failed its first significant test." Blodget also writes, "It's possible that reports like this will significantly damage CNN's credibility, and we wouldn't be surprised if this caused them to pull back from association with 'citizen journalism.'"
• John C. Dvorak of MarketWatch.com says the incident will probably result in a "re-evaluation of the idea of so-called citizen journalists, with a lot of criticism coming their way. My advice: Get over it. We're stuck with what we have. We are not going to be able to control bad reporting, disinformation, hoaxes and lies in this Internet age. It's like a bad forest fire; it can be contained but not controlled. And the likelihood of this sort of thing's being an everyday occurrence is fairly low."
• Betsy Schiffman of Wired.com explains how the hoax had a big impact ("the subject of Jobs' health is exactly the sort of front-burner item that would tend to catch fire") and she quotes an attorney as saying the perpetrator could face criminal charges and possibly prison time.